A question often circulates in literature; what makes a book a modern classic? Is it the way it is written? The language? The story? Or can it bottle down to the controversial impact it creates in a culture?
To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee is undoubtedly a modern classic. You can tell why just by mentioning the title, as those around you who have read it will express their love for this novel. For me personally the book was given to me years ago and I picked it up off the bookshelf because I felt like reading something different. Different is certainly what I got and with it an awe for a new style of writing and an understanding of how powerful fiction can be.
The story is set in a small fictional Southern US town in the state of Alabama in the 1930's, during the Great Depression. It is viewed from the eyes of a young girl who recounts her tale of the events of the book. With a lick of humour, we enter a child's mind and how she observes the world around her. In fact, it is this child's perspective that allows us to see not only the ignorance of the issues surrounding her, but an honest curiosity and fantastic innocence. Lee draws us in with a sense of wanting to pull readers back to their own childhood memories. However things change as the girl's father is chosen to defend a black man accused of the rape of a white woman. Condemned before he has even spoken, the power of this book revolves around racism; issues that are still around in some cultures today.
Our narrative character Scout Finch is a tomboy who looks up to and often plays with her older brother, Jem and their friend, Dill. Scouts mother died early and the kids have been brought up by their father, Atticus. Throughout the story we see Scout question many aspects of life, including some of her ignorant opinions injecting that subtle humour in the book that makes you smile, as well as some of her more intelligent responses. It is hard to consider the narrator is only eight years old, though her upbringing has suggested that she has matured quickly. What I enjoy most about Scout is that she has a great sense of spirit and strength for a young girl living in 1930s America. She doesnt act like a lady; she plays with boys and fights with boys.
The main character is Atticus who is a symbol for equality and probably the closest character to the author. It is clear through his words we hear the author's voice, which is probably why his words have become so dominant in the world of law, despite being a fictional character. In fact the Atticus is so admired, his name and the case revolving around the story has been treated as if this was reality. It is Atticus that makes this story a modern classic, and his timeless words and admirable morals epitomise him as a good father figure and man of true justice.
The issue of racism is one which is linked so closely with the obvious metaphor in the title of the book. Atticus warns his children who are learning to shoot: "It's a sin to kill a mockingbird." Why? This is later confirmed when Scout asks Miss Maudie, a neighbour: "Mockingbirds don't do one thing but make music for us to enjoy. They don't eat up people's gardens, don't nest in corncribs, they don't do one thing but sing their hearts out for us. That's why it's a sin to kill a mocking bird." This metaphor of innocence reflects not only the innocence of the children, but that of the black man accused of rape. Tom Robinson is so blatantly guiltless, that as a reader you are in hope he is found innocent, but you already know from the towns treatment of Negros the case has already been decided. He is a humble honest man, who seemingly just wanted to help his accuser, just like the mockingbird only sings. As Atticus even says, this is a case of black verses white.
From the moment you take in the first page of the book, we embrace the calm pace of the summer; a pace which changes gradually throughout the novel to the point where the book hits a turning point. As the story develops we see young adventures become harsh realities and Scout and Jem having to grow up in a short period of time. The author has an admirable ability to introduce everything about a character in just short snippety descriptions. It was this capturing of character that really drew me into the novel and brought the town to life. Whether we hear about a character through the gossips of the ladies in the neighbourhood, or through our narrator, every character has a history that follows through the common attributes of their family and the individual.
As a whole I thoroughly enjoyed this novel. I felt this town was a representation of any southern US state that existed during the years of the great depression and brought that lifestyle to the reality to an English reader. The semi-autobiographical feel to the book is what gets us involved and connected as the audience, an ability that is essential for any writer.
I am glad this book was recommended to me, and this is indefinitely a novel I would recommend to others. To Kill a Mockingbird had class, intrigue and controversy. A modern classic? Most certainly.







Devious Comments
Now that you've read the book, I'd see the film too. It'll make you laugh, and it really is great.
--
THE APPLE SOFTWARE IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, etc.
If I can't use iTunes+Quicktime to create my nuclear bomb, what will I use?
I think there a few things you need to specify, which wouldn't be clear from this if I hadn't read the book. You only really imply that Atticus is Scout and Jem's father - I'd tag that onto the end of 'brought up by their father' in paragraph four. I think it might also be pertinent to point out that Scout is white, as was the author, so that the story is told entirely from the perspective of a white female. As race is such a dominant issue in the book, I think it's relevant to talk about it here.
I can see what you mean about it being a bit essay-ish at times. This is particularly true of the paragraph about Atticus. Your use of the word ' possibly' is reminiscent of trying to please pernickety teachers, and the closing sentence in that paragraph reads exactly like an essay. I don't think it damages the review, and it's fine as is, but I have to admit it does stick out. But in spite of that, it's a good portrayal of Atticus; you use him to pick out some really key moments in the novel, and offer them as an incentive to read the book. If I hadn't already read the court case, I'd be bubbling over with curiosity about now.
There is a mistyped sentence about halfway through that paragraph, and a few typos throughout, including one or two incorrect uses of apostrophes - I'm sure you'll spot them if you read through it again.
P.S. I've just read through all that. Sorry if I come across as a bit smug in the I've-read-it bits.
--
News reporter for *simplyprose | Children's feature director for *WordCount: please note me with links to great children's prose!
great review, but i find it too florid - i'd tighten it, and try to give it a more clearer viewpoint.
--
CLUBS WITH MOAR IB=Manipulators ~stock-artists *WordCount ~fineart-photography
If I fav and run, it's because I like it and don't have any constructive critique, get over it. <3NCritique: Firstly, I enjoyed this. I'll make that clear from the start
Secondly, I think you haven't been all too successful in the genre of review, as far too much of the review is summary of the book. It's hard not to fall into such a situation, and, indeed, many segments of your review DO meet the job of analysis that a review should meet - but nowhere near enough. To make a guess, I would say there is a 50-50 amount of summary-review, which is probably too much summary and not enough review.
SAVING that though, you DID mix a lot of analytical comments amongst the summary, so I suppose in the end you did stick to the review fairly well...
I hope this helps, I haven't made any examples but I think that if you look at it you could see it yourself. If you didn't want this kind of critique - sorry, five weeks of uni and I already feel like a walking criteria sheet!
--
When life gives you lemons, write about it.
~~
Is there a deviation in your or a friend's gallery that you have reason to believe I'll like? Tell me!
~~
I am a proud staff member of *WordCount. Check it out!
Although I thought that "modern classic" meant a contemporary novel that would be likely to become a classic? Else I would just call it a classic?
--
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
I often randomly comment on other deviants' work. Feel free to return the favour!
--
*Writers-Workshop
Hate Miscats? Why not consider a spot of spring cleaning?
Either way, I just felt somewhat disappointed by the ending, I'm not really even sure why.
--
THE APPLE SOFTWARE IS NOT INTENDED FOR USE IN THE OPERATION OF NUCLEAR FACILITIES, etc.
If I can't use iTunes+Quicktime to create my nuclear bomb, what will I use?
Previous PageNext Page